• Events
• Historic

The Rise and Fall of Urban Renewal

The Mostly Dark Side of Urban Renewal

In the 1960s, urban renewal promised to clear out blighted, decaying, or underutilized urban areas and redevelop them with new housing, upgraded infrastructure, commercial facilities, and public spaces. The official pitch claimed it would revitalize cities, improve living conditions, and modernize aging infrastructure.

Instead, cities weaponized eminent domain — the legal right of a government to expropriate private property for public use with minimal compensation. Federal and state governments used this power to tear down whole communities, forcing homeowners, renters and businesses out of their neighborhoods. This placed an especially crushing burden on fixed- and low-income renters. Governments historically targeted Black and other minority neighborhoods-such as San Francisco's Fillmore District — shattering vibrant cultural centers in the process. Entire neighborhoods in cities like Boston, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, and Washington, DC were demolished. Many cleared areas became parking lots or vacant land when promised development never materialized.

Las Cruces Corazon

The history of downtown Las Cruces, New Mexico is one of the most painful, textbook examples of mid-century urban renewal. It perfectly illustrates how the sanitized sales pitch of city planning manifests as a cultural tragedy on the ground. By the late 1960s, the Las Cruces Urban Renewal Agency used federal funding to clear a massive 94-acre footprint. In a desperate attempt to compete with suburban shopping centers, city leaders completely leveled the heart of New Mexico's second-largest city. Without federal money, this disaster would have likely never happened.

The Casualties of the Las Cruces

• St Genevieve's Catholic Church:Built in 1886, this historic anchor of the community was demolished in 1967. Its destruction remains the most memorable and painful casualty of the project for lifelong residents.
• Commercial Core & Residences: Over 70% of downtownƋs buildings were destroyed. This wiped out centuries-old Spanish, Mexican and American adobe architecture.
• Human Displacement: The project forced 84 families, 52 individuals, and 122 businesses to relocate or close down forever.

The Failed Promise: The Downtown Mall

The city replaced this vibrant historic core with an open-air, covered pedestrian shopping center completed in 1972. They closed off Main Street to vehicles, added metal awnings, and laid a yellow brick path.

It was an immediate economic disaster. The sterile design failed to draw crowds, vacancies skyrocketed, and active downtown businesses plummeted from 160 to just 90. Decades later, local historians and residents widely look back on the project as the city's worst mistake.

The Mesquite Street Original Townsite Historic District survived largely because the bulldozers ran out of funding before moving further east. The city eventually spent millions to reverse the urban renewal project by tearing down the failed Downtown Mall to reopen Main Street to traffic. This stands in stark contrast to the adjacent historic town of Mesilla, which rejected urban renewal; its original historic plaza survived intact and remains a thriving cultural hub packed with successful restaurants, bars, and shopping.

San Diego's Horton Plaza Mall

When San Diego cleared the blight to build Horton Plaza and revitalize the Gaslamp Quarter in the late 1970s and 1980s, the city aggressively demolished and converted Single Room Occupancy (SRO) hotels. These old residential hotels were the absolute bottom rung of the housing ladder, but they served as a vital home for low-income seniors, veterans, and individuals living with severe physical or mental disabilities.

Destruction of the SRO Safety Net

• The Rapid Disappearance: When Horton Plaza was built, San Diego lost roughly a quarter of its entire SRO housing stock almost overnight. In the late 1980s, San Diego had roughly 14,000 SRO rooms downtown. By recent counts, that number has plummeted to fewer than 3,900 rooms.
• The Push Onto the Street: The original marketing of urban renewal promised that residents would be moved to better housing. Instead, thousands of fragile, fixed-income individuals were evicted into a skyrocketing rental market. Most had nowhere to go but the pavement.

Displacements Linked Directly to Death

For medically fragile seniors or individuals requiring regular treatments, being forced onto the street is a rapid death sentence. Even for those fortunate enough to be relocated to new studios or temporary shelters, the trauma of displacement — exposure to the elements, an unfamiliar setting, and the abrupt loss of a stable community safety net — caused mortality rates to spike.

Renewed Urban Renewal: The Cycle Continues

Today, modern urban renewal isn't even called urban renewal anymore. To distance themselves from past atrocities, governments changed the guidelines to a seemingly gentler, three-pronged approach:

• Redevelopment: Demolishing structures that are structurally unsound or obsolete to build new real estate or infrastructure.
• Rehabilitation: Restoring and repairing existing historical or structurally sound buildings to extend their usable life.
• Conservation: Preserving the existing character and structure of a neighborhood by preventing inappropriate development.

Despite the new vocabulary, the cycle continues. Even in more recent hotel closures — such as the conversion of the historic Plaza Hotel on Fourth Avenue in 2019 or the recent closures of temporary housing hotels — advocates continuously track how losing these rooms directly results in vulnerable seniors and disabled people ending up back on the streets or dying in unfamiliar environments.

These catastrophic human failures are routinely written off by local governments as mere unintended consequences, cleanly absolving the city of fault. Yet, in a twist of political irony, politicians consistently campaign on promises that they can fix the very societal destruction their own institutions created — but only if you vote them back into office. - AsNotedIn